I continue to pursue justice within the system. It has been riddled with inequality and injustice, but I will not give up.
Judges have not been unbiased, lawyers who I had retained have been visited by government officials and agents to dissuade them from defended me and my family. Following several years of this, I began to investigate why this was happening; and discovered that my name was on the PMO (Prime Minister’s Office) non-representation list. So it has become very clear, this is a game of attrition (def. Attrition warfare, the military strategy of wearing down the enemy by continual losses in personnel and material) to the government in its attempt to silence me. So they have launched their machinery upon me and my family in a very methodical manner. They have seized and stripped me and my family of our money, valuables, residence; deporting our family, and restricted my ability to have a legal defense. See this letter from the Minister of Revenue to Caroline Dare; while a file is being contested and is under objections, Revenue is not supposed to seize personal property. But as you see from the video below; they did just that on March 24, 2011.
As part of their fishing expedition for documents, the RCMP obtained a search warrant on March 26, 2008, entered the family residence spent 14.5 hours taking every document in the house. The charges that stemmed from this illegal search and seizure came from 2 hand guns with bullets “they found” at the residence. Upon their arrival at the house, the police disconnected the home security system that included a camera system that videos all activity inside and outside the house. Amazing…since that day it is missing, the hidden recording hard drive is missing, so there is no copy of their search or anything before! How can an important piece of evidence like this go missing?
What is also amazing is that no pictures exist of the bullets; there are NO FINGERPRINTS on the guns or the bullets, and yet one of the guns was supposedly in a pocket of one of my suits in a closet. How does an object get into your pocket if not with your hand, so there should be fingerprints? How can they take the time to photograph a $100 bill on a table, but not any pictures of bullets - they supposedly found near the gun(s).
How can they charge me with close proximity of bullets to guns when they have hundreds of pictures of that day and no pictures of this? What is extraordinary about this, is that this particular charge is what carries the mandatory jail sentence. (This means I would not have a political career and my professional life with a felony conviction would be destroyed).
This is, after all, the government’s objective to destroy my life and reputation with a conviction and jail time. To silence me completely and remove any chance for what started this government’s campaign of destruction on my life: my attempt to purchase the Laurentian Bank in 2006 with a consortium of Arab investors.
I had put together a group of Canadian notables who would serve as the Board of Directors and Specialists in this new bank; among them Hon. John Crosbie, Hon. John Reynolds, and David Bernstein, QC; who was my political advisor. We had engaged a firm to represent the Arab Consortium and had moved a substantial deposit into the Canadian account of the investors at Merrill Lynch in Toronto.
When the ‘wrong’ type of people begin to have influence, market presence, and encroach on the POWER-BROKERS turf; it becomes a strategic war to silence them and remove them from the landscape.
There has been a direct prevailing wind blowing across the North American continent whose purpose was to keep the Muslim and Arab groups off-shore and out of businesses. The government closing the door on me was curiously at the same time the US was closing its doors, ports, and shores to the same profile of investors.
Muslim and Arab groups say uproar over ports amounts to profiling
National Catholic Reporter, March 3, 2006
Arab-and Muslim-American leaders say the uproar over a White House deal that would turn over operations of several major U.S. ports to an Arab-owned company could leave many in the Islamic world thinking Americans hate them.
"This is sending a dangerous message not only to Arab and Muslim citizens of this country about how we in America see Arabs and Muslims, but also to the Muslim world, where we're trying to win hearts and minds," said Rabiah Ahmed, a spokeswoman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington-based advocacy group. "It's almost as if it's a race to see who can be more anti-Arab."
Citing security concerns, politicians and commentators from both sides of the aisle have fiercely criticized a $6.8 billion acquisition by Dubai Ports World, owned by one of the United Arab Emirates, of Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. The British company had been managing shipping terminals in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., chair of the House Homeland Security Committee--a legislator the Council on American-Islamic Relations has in the past accused of Islamophobia--said he would help draft emergency legislation to kill the deal. The deal was approved by the White House, and President Bush said he would veto any bill against it.
Mary Rose Oakar, president of the Washington-based American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee said her group "is strongly opposed to the rhetoric and bias surrounding the company solely because it is Arab-owned. Those who purport that ports can be securely run by a British company but not an Arab one are engaging in racial profiling on the corporate level."
Some industry analysts have said turning the ports over to Dubai Ports World would not affect security, which would still be done by American workers.
Hazami Barmada, an Arab-American senior at Rhodes College in Tennessee where she is president of the Muslim Students Association, says the episode demonstrates an increasing tendency in America to automatically link everything that is Arab or Muslim with terrorism.
"There's always this theme of the Arab threat. The American media [have] allowed a few terrorists to hijack the Arab image," Barmadi, 22, said. "Arab-bashing is fashionable."
As you recall, the US and Canada are the only countries who have not signed the UN agreement against rendition and covert abduction of citizens in the interest of National Security. I want to know why these countries continue to act like a liberal open-minded society, when in reality they are closed and bigoted racists. Switzerland has refused to allow nations to use their airspace for such flights of rendition and abductions; as they cite they are catastrophic human right violations.
.
Bringing this matter 360˚...the answer to the question of where did they get the false information for the articles is RCMP Cpl. Daniel Aubin, who has furnished information to Michel Strecko, the government informant. They can't keep their stories straight however, as it happens the information in the La Presse in May 2008, was false also; this time its that I was arrested with $2 Million Euros; FALSE. See the letter from Swiss FED POL, which clearly states that I have no criminal record anywhere in Switzerland. And remember, that it was very coincidental that 20 minutes after the reporter called me for a comment on May 9, 2008, Michel Strecko called me and made very threatening and intimidating comments to me that was heard by my 7 year old daughter, at the time. He was very happy while calling me a “papillion de nuit”, my time was almost up, my family including my newborn son was soon to be over. I had filed a police report immediately with the police for the threats against me and my family by Michel Strecko; but because he is a government informant, he is protected.
Of course this is a conversation that my daughter does not nor will ever forget. She suffered night terrors and related trauma induced illnesses. That fact that someone could even consider my children as part of a coordinated attack against me is further evidence that they lack integrity.
In October 2008, I filed a federal court action to sue the government for restoration of my name and for punitive damages against the government for the destruction of my life and my family. The lawyers were visited and pressure was applied to remove this case from the court; the lawyers without my consent and knowledge struck a deal with the defendants and removed the case from court.
I will re-file this action and its affect will be the same as Mr. Arar, when it was uncovered the Canadian’s government involvement in his extraordinary rendition, and their complicity with the United States in his detention and torture. Mr. Arar was vindicated and he is still fighting for his reputation to be restored and to be free after the government destroyed his life and his family’s peace. I will do the same..
.
The government has still in reserve the 2 ultimate tools in their campaign of terror...Security Certificate and Extraordinary Rendition. These are the most frightening spectres in their arsenal and are used when their other tools prove ineffective. Based on what will they obtain these against me? It is important to realize that Canada and the US were the only 2 nations who have refused to sign the UN convention prohibiting the covert movement of citizens under these two types of mechanisms. (See reference link). The Swiss have also refused to associate themselves with this type of terrorism to the point where they have lodged an action and complaint before the UN and World Court complaining that even their airspace was violated by countries transversing their borders via aircraft carrying individuals being moved for the purpose of secretive and involuntary detainment under rendition rules (perceived not proved threat to a country).
Citizenship and Immigration Canada had resurfaced in the government`s campaign against me. As of Friday, September 25, 2008; my wife received notification that her Application for renewal of her ministerial permit, pending her application for permanent residency, was refused. This clearly, given the situation of her home here and our children in school and our newborn son, was an intentional act by the government to separate me from my family and cause further prejudicial harm to me, my family, and our life.
We can consider that a target of government terrorism can be a newborn child or an undesirable, expendable citizen. It [terrorism] is the purposeful act or threat of violence to create fear or to bring about compliant behaviour in a victim; this distinguishes it from other forms of political violence. (Michael Stohl, Professor of Political Science at Purdue University).
I have decided to take an offensive position by entering into the social media revolution. This group will provide a forum for our fellow citizens to speak their mind about the abuse of power exhibited by the government. It will draw attention to the rampant corruption, the loss of our human and civil rights, and the government’s shameful activities against immigrants and new Canadians. The abuses and torture they have inflicted upon their citizens and foreigners.
We do have a voice, we do have freedom to express our thoughts and opinions, and we do have the right to expect government that is accountable. We should expect no less for ourselves and our children that we can be proud of our nation, its variety of cultures, our successes and the vast opportunities to make a difference everyday as global citizens.
Let us join together in this global revolution and restore our freedoms, values, and rights. Let us ensure that our children have those freedoms, values and rights for their future.
WE ARE HERE, WE HAVE A VOICE, and WE WILL BE HEARD!
We live in this country, go on with our daily lives, we worry about our children, their safety, their happiness, their education, and their health. We work to make sure we provide for our family’s needs.
But do we consider that the government through erosion of our Human and Civil Rights can take everything from us including our freedom, our homes, and our children’s future?
We, as global citizens joined in social media, are part of the new revolution of thought and circumstances. These issues are facing us here with unaccountable government that is sucking the life out of us, political parties that are deeply corrupted, a system that is irrelevant to our new global citizenship, and that fails to protect our human and civil rights.
Thank you for your interest in our story and I ask that you consider your life, your children’s lives, your future and speak out for them!
Follow on my facebook/twitter
Read the Blog
Support the cause
MY ACTIONS |
|
Bringing this matter 360˚...the answer to the question of where did they get the information for the articles is Michel Strecko, the government informant. It is very coincidental that 20 minutes after the reporter called me for a comment on May 9, 2008, Michel Strecko called me and made very threatening and intimidating comments to me that was heard by my 7 year old daughter. He was very happy while calling me a “papillion de nuit”, my time was almost up, my family including my newborn son was soon to be over. I filed a police report immediately with the police for the threats against me and my family by Michel Strecko.
|
Standby Tools of Terrorism.... |
|
The government has still in reserve the 2 ultimate tools in their campaign of terror...Security Certificate and Extraordinary Rendition. These are the most frightening spectres in their arsenal and are used when their other tools prove ineffective. Based on what will they obtain these against me? It is important to realize that Canada and the US were the only 2 nations who have refused to sign the UN convention prohibiting the covert movement of citizens under these two types of mechanisms. (See reference link). The Swiss have also refused to associate themselves with this type of terrorism to the point where they have lodged an action and complaint before the UN and World Court complaining that even their airspace was violated by countries transversing their borders via aircraft carrying individuals being moved for the purpose of secretive and involuntary detainment under rendition rules (perceived not proved threat to a country). Citizenship and Immigration Canada has resurfaced in the government`s campaign against me. As of Friday, September 25, 2008; my wife received notification that her Application for renewal of her ministerial permit, pending her application for permanent residency, was refused. This clearly, given the situation of her home here and our children in school and our newborn son, was an intentional act by the government to separate me from my family and cause further prejudicial harm to me, my family, and our life. |
This can happen to you... |
|
We can consider that a target of government terrorism can be a newborn child or an undesirable, expendable citizen. It [terrorism] is the purposeful act or threat of violence to create fear or to bring about compliant behaviour in a victim; this distinguishes it from other forms of political violence. ( Michael Stohl, Professor of Political Science at Purdue University). |
My Action |
|
I am filing a Federal Court Action in damages against Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Crown prosecutor Marlene Archer, the RCMP, Agent Mark Legault (RCMP), Ministry of Public Safety, Stockwell Day, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Maxime Bernier, Canada Revenue Agency, Rene Gagniere, Richard Martel, Wissam Hannah, Citizenship & Immigration Canada, Diane Finley, Surete du Quebec, Jacques Beaupre, and Michel Strecko. What will happen next.... |